Alternative
Best Lindy Alternatives in 2026: Gumloop, Relevance AI & n8n
Compare Lindy alternatives including Gumloop, Relevance AI and n8n by pricing, AI agents, usage models, integrations, self-hosting and best-fit teams.
Lindy combines an AI teammate, Slack interaction, meetings, inbox management, routines and cross-app work in one product. That model is attractive for teams that want automation to feel like working with a colleague, but other platforms may fit better when the organization prefers a visual builder, multi-agent workforce design, self-hosting or a different pricing model.
For this comparison, we selected three alternatives already represented by approved SearchSagar Tool records: Gumloop, Relevance AI and n8n. Each can automate multi-step work with AI, but their interfaces and economics are very different.
Quick verdict
Choose Gumloop when you want a dedicated no-code AI agent and workflow platform with unlimited seats on Pro, Company Brain, BYOK and explicit pass-through usage economics. Choose Relevance AI when you want multi-agent Workforces, calling and meeting agents, strong evaluation tooling and separate metering for actions and model spend. Choose n8n when technical flexibility, visual workflow control, code, self-hosting and predictable execution-based billing matter most. Stay with Lindy when Slack-native teamwork, meetings, inbox work and natural-language delegation are more important than building workflows visually.
Key takeaways
- Lindy Plus costs $29.99/user/month with 3,000 pooled credits per seat
- Gumloop Pro starts at $37/month with 20,000 included credits, unlimited seats and a 14-day Pro trial
- Gumloop's current usage model passes through model and compute cost plus an 8% orchestration fee
- Relevance AI has a Free plan and Pro at $29/month or $19 annual-equivalent, with separate Actions and Vendor Credits
- Relevance AI Team is currently listed at $349/month and adds calling/meeting agents, A/B testing, analytics and larger collaboration limits
- n8n Cloud Starter is €20/month billed annually with 2,500 workflow executions, unlimited users and 2,300 AI Assistant credits
- n8n Cloud Pro is €50/month billed annually with 10,000 executions and up to 13,700 AI Assistant credits
- Lindy remains the most teammate-like option of the four because everyday interaction centers on Slack, meetings, email and recurring routines
L
Lindy Tested
AI teammate for inbox, meetings, workflows, research and connected business tools
Best for: Teams that want an AI teammate to manage cross-application knowledge work such as meetings, email, research, support and recurring operational routines.
Features and capabilities4.8
Usability and implementation4.7
Pricing and value transparency4.3
Integrations, security and trust4.8
Key features
- Skills
- Meeting Prep and Follow-Up
- Meeting Recording and Notes
- Scheduled Routines
- Slack-Native Teammate
Pros
- G2 reviewers strongly praise Lindy's no-code automation and agent-building experience for getting useful workflows live quickly.
- The product combines Slack, meetings, inbox, scheduled routines, files, computer use and connected apps rather than requiring separate assistants for each job.
- Every paid seat contributes credits to one shared workspace pool, which lets teams allocate capacity where it is actually needed.
Cons
- G2 category summaries report that users can find Lindy expensive when workflows consume credits quickly or require correction.
- Some reviewers cite a steeper learning curve for sophisticated automations despite the no-code positioning.
unverified USD 29.99/user/month(unverified)
Visit website
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission.
Why users may look for a Lindy alternative
The most common reason is pricing structure. Lindy bills by seat and measures work in credits that can vary widely by job complexity. Teams with many occasional users can prefer an unlimited-seat plan such as Gumloop Pro, while automation-heavy technical teams may prefer n8n's workflow-execution model.
Another reason is how automation is built. Lindy emphasizes delegation in natural language. Gumloop and n8n expose more explicit workflow-building environments, while Relevance AI focuses on agents and multi-agent Workforces. Some teams prefer that visibility because they want to inspect exactly how a process runs.
Testing methodology
This comparison is research-based and uses current official vendor pricing and product documentation plus approved SearchSagar Tool records. SearchSagar has not claimed hands-on benchmark testing for these platforms unless separately documented.
Lindy alternatives at a glance
| Criteria | Lindy | Gumloop | Relevance AI | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Slack-native AI teammate and recurring knowledge work | No-code AI agents and team workflows | Multi-agent AI Workforces and business automation | Technical workflow automation, AI agents and self-hosting |
| Starting paid price | $29.99/user/month | Pro starts $37/month | Pro $29/month or $19 annual-equivalent | €20/month billed annually for Cloud Starter |
| Free access | Conditional 7-day Slack teammate trial | 14-day Pro trial; legacy/current free access can vary by rollout | Free plan with 200 Actions/month | No-card cloud trial; Community Edition available for self-hosters |
| Usage model | Credits by work complexity | Included credits plus pass-through model/tool/compute usage and orchestration fee | Actions plus Vendor Credits | Workflow executions plus AI Assistant credits |
| Seat model | Per user | Unlimited seats on Pro | Plan-specific users/build users | Unlimited users on cloud plans |
| Main advantage | Natural-language delegation inside Slack, meetings and inbox | Flexible no-code agent infrastructure and BYOK | Multi-agent Workforces, calling, meetings, evaluations | Visual control, code, execution pricing and self-hosting |
1. Gumloop — Best for no-code AI agents with unlimited seats
Best for: Teams that want a more explicit agent-building and workflow environment than Lindy while avoiding per-seat pricing on the self-serve Pro tier.
What differentiates Gumloop?
Gumloop is a no-code platform for building AI agents and workflows that use company data, tools and more than 35 AI models. Its current Pro plan starts at $37 per month with 20,000 included credits and supports unlimited seats, teams and agents. New accounts currently get a 14-day Pro trial.
Gumloop updated its usage model in August 2026. It now describes model tokens and compute as passed through at cost, with a base 8% orchestration fee on top. Pro also supports BYOK, which can reduce platform-side model charges when teams use their own provider credentials.
G
Gumloop Tested
No-code AI agent and workflow platform with models, connectors and enterprise governance
Best for: Operations, sales, marketing and technical teams that want to build AI agents and deterministic workflows across many SaaS tools without maintaining their own orchestration infrastructure.
Features and capabilities4.8
Usability and implementation4.6
Pricing and value transparency4.3
Integrations, security and trust4.8
Key features
- Company Brain
- Bring Your Own Key
- Enterprise security and governance
- CLI and Developer Tools
- 180+ Built-In Connectors
Pros
- G2 reviewers praise Gumloop's intuitive visual experience and the ability to move from an idea to a working automation without being a software engineer.
- Pro includes unlimited agents, seats and teams, reducing seat-based friction for organizations that want broad internal experimentation.
- The platform supports 35+ models and BYOK for OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, xAI, Perplexity, DeepSeek and Fireworks, letting teams choose models by task.
Cons
- G2's current Gumloop review base is only seven reviews, so its 4.8/5 rating has much less evidence than mature automation platforms.
- The old permanent Free plan has been replaced by a 14-day Pro trial for new accounts, increasing the commitment required to keep using the platform.
unverified USD 37/month(unverified)
Visit website
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission.
Where Gumloop may be better than Lindy
- Unlimited seats on Pro: collaboration is not priced per user in the same way as Lindy.
- Visual build environment: teams can inspect and design agents and workflows explicitly.
- BYOK: businesses can bring their own model API keys.
- Company Brain: agents can operate from shared organizational knowledge.
- Transparent usage model: Gumloop publishes its pass-through cost approach and orchestration fee.
Where Lindy may be better
- Slack-native delegation: non-builders can simply mention Lindy and request an outcome.
- Meetings and inbox experience: these are core teammate features rather than only workflow components.
- Approval-first actions: Lindy makes consequential external actions a visible part of the teammate interaction.
- Less builder overhead: teams that do not want to design workflows may prefer Lindy's conversational approach.
Choose Gumloop if the company wants agent infrastructure and many collaborators. Choose Lindy if the goal is to make automation feel like asking a colleague in Slack.
2. Relevance AI — Best for multi-agent Workforces
Best for: Operations, sales and support teams that want to create several specialized agents, coordinate them into Workforces and measure agent behavior with more explicit management tooling.
What differentiates Relevance AI?
Relevance AI is a no-code AI workforce platform built around Agents, Tools and Workforces. The Free plan includes 200 Actions per month plus bonus Vendor Credits. Pro costs $29 monthly or $19 per month on annual billing and adds scheduling, unlimited Workforces, smart escalations, premium triggers and BYO LLM support.
Relevance separates Actions—the operational steps agents take—from Vendor Credits used for model consumption. Extra Actions currently cost $40 per 1,000, while extra Vendor Credits cost $20 per 10,000. The current Team tier is listed at $349 per month and adds larger collaboration limits, calling and meeting agents, A/B testing and analytics.
RA
Relevance AI Tested
No-code AI workforce platform for agents, multi-agent teams and business automation
Best for: Operations, sales, support and business teams that want to build no-code AI agents and multi-agent workflows connected to their existing application stack.
Features and capabilities4.9
Usability and implementation4.7
Pricing and value transparency4.4
Integrations, security and trust4.9
Key features
- Scheduled Tasks
- AI Agents
- A/B Testing and Analytics
- Agent Evaluations
- Calling and Meeting Agents
Pros
- G2 reviewers commonly praise Relevance AI for making customized AI-agent creation accessible without requiring a traditional software-development project.
- The current platform supports unlimited Agents and Tools on all plans and lets teams combine agents into Workforces for multi-agent execution.
- Invent can create and edit agents, tools, workforces, knowledge tables, triggers and evaluations from natural-language instructions.
Cons
- G2 feedback shows a split on value: many users like the automation capability, while some small-business reviewers describe paid pricing as expensive for general use.
- Actions and Vendor Credits are separate usage concepts, so total cost requires understanding both platform task volume and model consumption.
Free plan(unverified)
Visit website
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission.
Where Relevance AI may be better than Lindy
- Permanent Free plan: teams can explore agents without Lindy's conditional Slack-only trial.
- Multi-agent Workforces: several agents can be coordinated as an explicit system.
- Calling and meeting agents: higher plans support agents that participate in voice and meeting workflows.
- Evaluation and analytics: Team and Enterprise provide more explicit A/B testing, analytics and evaluation capabilities.
- Separate usage meters: Actions and Vendor Credits make platform operations and model spend visible as different cost categories.
Where Lindy may be better
- More natural teammate interaction: Lindy centers the user experience on Slack, inbox and routine delegation.
- One shared usage concept: Lindy credits are simpler than managing Actions plus Vendor Credits, even if individual tasks vary.
- Integrated meetings and email: these are part of the core teammate experience on every paid self-serve plan.
- Lower jump to heavier individual usage: Lindy Pro can be more incremental than moving from Relevance Pro into a team-oriented tier.
Choose Relevance AI if you want to design and govern an AI workforce. Choose Lindy if you want an AI teammate that ordinary users interact with directly.
3. n8n — Best for technical flexibility and self-hosting
Best for: Technical operations, developers and automation teams that want visual workflow orchestration plus code, APIs and self-hosting options.
What differentiates n8n?
n8n is a workflow automation and AI-agent platform with a visual node builder, JavaScript and Python support, APIs, webhooks and more than 2,000 integrations. Unlike Lindy, its main pricing meter is the number of complete workflow executions rather than work-depth credits.
n8n Cloud Starter currently costs €20 per month billed annually for 2,500 workflow executions, unlimited users and 2,300 AI Assistant credits. Pro is €50 per month billed annually for 10,000 executions, three shared projects, higher concurrency and up to 13,700 AI Assistant credits depending on the tier. n8n also offers self-hosting, including a Community Edition.
N
n8n Tested
Workflow automation and AI-agent platform combining visual orchestration, code and self-hosting
Best for: Technical operations, product and engineering teams that want flexible cross-app automation with AI, APIs and code while retaining the option to self-host.
Features and capabilities5.0
Usability and implementation4.5
Pricing and value transparency4.7
Integrations, security and trust4.9
Key features
- Enterprise security
- AI Assistant and AI Builder
- Git Version Control and Environments
- Visual Workflow Builder
- Self-Hosted Community Edition
Pros
- G2 reviewers strongly praise n8n for combining a visual workflow builder with custom JavaScript and Python when no-code nodes are not enough.
- n8n charges cloud plans by complete workflow execution rather than every individual workflow step, which can make complex automations more economical.
- Community Edition provides permanent free self-hosted access to core n8n capabilities with no time limit.
Cons
- G2 feedback indicates that advanced workflows can have a learning curve, especially around data mapping, custom code and production debugging.
- Community self-hosting is free software but still requires infrastructure, maintenance, backups, monitoring and security expertise.
Free plan(unverified)
Visit website
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission.
Where n8n may be better than Lindy
- Execution-based pricing: a 50-step workflow still counts as one execution, which can be predictable for complex deterministic automations.
- Unlimited cloud users: team size is not the primary price meter on Starter and Pro.
- Code and low-code: JavaScript, Python, API calls and custom nodes give technical teams more control.
- Self-hosting: organizations can run n8n in their own environment.
- Visual observability: workflows make logic, branching and data movement explicit.
Where Lindy may be better
- Less technical interaction: Lindy is designed so a user can simply ask for an outcome in Slack.
- Personal productivity: meetings, inbox, nudges and daily briefs are central product experiences.
- Agentic flexibility without building nodes: the user can delegate open-ended research and follow-up directly.
- Front-line adoption: non-technical employees may start faster because they do not need to learn a workflow editor.
Choose n8n when the automation team wants control and infrastructure flexibility. Choose Lindy when the end users themselves should interact with the AI teammate directly.
Lindy vs Gumloop vs Relevance AI vs n8n: pricing perspective
Lindy starts at $29.99 per user, Gumloop Pro at $37 per workspace-style plan with unlimited seats, Relevance AI Pro at $29 monthly or $19 annual-equivalent, and n8n Cloud Starter at €20 annual-equivalent. Those prices describe completely different usage models.
Lindy charges by seat and work credits. Gumloop includes credits but increasingly prices underlying model, tool and compute usage transparently. Relevance AI separates agent Actions from Vendor Credits. n8n meters full workflow executions and has a separate allowance for its AI Assistant. The only fair comparison is to run the same recurring process through each cost model.
Which Lindy alternative should you choose?
Choose Gumloop if you need unlimited collaborators and an explicit no-code agent platform. Choose Relevance AI if you want multi-agent Workforces, deeper agent management and evaluation. Choose n8n if technical control, code and self-hosting matter most. Stay with Lindy if Slack-native delegation, meetings, inbox and teammate-style interaction are what will drive adoption.
Who should use this
- Consider a Lindy alternative when your team wants to build and inspect automation systems directly: Gumloop for no-code agents, Relevance AI for multi-agent Workforces, or n8n for technical workflow orchestration and self-hosting.
Who should avoid this
- Do not switch based only on the entry subscription price. Lindy, Gumloop, Relevance AI and n8n meter usage in fundamentally different ways, so the cheapest sticker price may not be the lowest total cost for your workflow.
Related Lindy articles
Final comparison
Lindy, Gumloop, Relevance AI and n8n all automate knowledge work, but the user experience differs sharply. Lindy is a teammate that works through Slack and connected productivity surfaces. Gumloop is an AI agent and workflow platform. Relevance AI is an AI workforce builder. n8n is a technical automation environment with agent capabilities.
The most important buying question is who will operate the system. If every employee should be able to delegate work naturally, Lindy has a structural advantage. If an automation team will design systems for everyone else, Gumloop, Relevance AI or n8n may provide more control and more transparent workflow logic.
Expert tip
Take one recurring process—such as meeting follow-up, lead research or support triage—and implement it conceptually in all four pricing models. Count seats, runs, model usage, retries and human setup time. The platform with the lowest monthly subscription is not necessarily the one with the lowest operating cost.
— SearchSagar editorial team
What is the best alternative to Lindy?
It depends on the operating model. Gumloop is strong for no-code agent workflows, Relevance AI for multi-agent Workforces, and n8n for technical automation and self-hosting. Lindy remains distinctive for Slack-native teammate interaction.
Is Gumloop cheaper than Lindy?
Gumloop Pro starts at $37 per month and includes unlimited seats, while Lindy Plus is $29.99 per user. For teams with many users, Gumloop's seat model may be cheaper, but usage pricing and workflow consumption still matter.
Is Relevance AI cheaper than Lindy?
Relevance AI Pro is $29 monthly or $19 annual-equivalent, close to Lindy Plus at $29.99. Relevance AI separates Actions from Vendor Credits, so total cost depends on both operational steps and model usage.
Is n8n cheaper than Lindy?
n8n Cloud Starter is €20 per month billed annually with unlimited users and 2,500 workflow executions. It can be cost-effective for technical automation, but it requires more workflow-building effort than Lindy's teammate-style experience.
Which Lindy alternative is best for self-hosting?
n8n is the strongest option in this comparison for self-hosting. Its Community Edition and paid self-hosted plans give technical teams more infrastructure control than Lindy's SaaS teammate model.